Working Capital & the Import Cash Gap

An imported beverage brand pays its European supplier a deposit months before a single US case sells — and often waits net-60 after that to collect from wholesale. That lag between cash out and cash back is the import cash gap. For a first US run it commonly spans 90–150 days (CFO Pro Analytics), and it is where undercapitalised launches quietly die.

Founders rarely search for this until the cash goes negative. By then the container is on the water, the deposit is spent, and the question is no longer how much but how do I bridge it. This guide maps the gap week by week — EU deposit through net-60 collection — then covers how to finance it and how to shorten it.

---

Key Takeaways

• The cash-conversion cycle for emerging CPG brands commonly runs 90–150 days (CFO Pro Analytics); for an imported brand, EU production and ocean transit sit inside that window, widening it further.
• Transatlantic ocean freight from Europe to the US East Coast typically takes 2–5 weeks in transit alone (Freightos/industry lane data), before customs and 3PL receiving.
• Wholesale and distributor terms in beverage are commonly net-30 to net-60 (Resolve), so your largest receivable is also your slowest.
• Cash goes most negative at US arrival — supplier balance, freight, duty, and receiving are all paid, and nothing has sold.
• Supplier deposit terms are the cheapest lever: a favourable deposit/balance split can move weeks of cash off your books at zero financing cost.
• 2026 financing costs, per Bridge Marketplace: asset-based inventory lines 8–15% APR, purchase-order financing 12–30%, revenue-based financing 15–35% effective APR.
• The SBA Export Working Capital Program finances US exporters, not EU brands importing into the US (SBA) — a common and costly misread.

---

What is the import cash gap, and why does it hit imported brands harder?

The import cash gap is the number of days your cash is committed — from the first EU supplier deposit until you collect on your first US sales — with nothing coming back in between. It is the cash-conversion cycle applied to a supply chain that crosses an ocean, so the inventory-holding portion is measured in weeks of production plus weeks of transit, not days.

The formula every operator should know is the cash-conversion cycle: CCC = DIO + DSO − DPO — days inventory outstanding, plus days your receivables are outstanding, minus days you are allowed to delay paying suppliers (J.P. Morgan; Wall Street Prep). For most CPG companies this runs 45 to 210+ days, with 90–150 days common for a brand shipping into retail (CFO Pro Analytics).

For a purely domestic brand, DIO is the time inventory sits in the warehouse. For an imported brand, DIO also swallows the EU production run and the transatlantic crossing — the goods exist and are paid for, but they are on a factory floor or a container ship, not on a shelf. That is why the same 90–150-day CCC feels far more brutal for an importer: a much larger share of it is pure cash-out with zero revenue.

The other half of the vice is DPO. Domestic co-packers sometimes extend terms; a new EU relationship almost never does at first, and typically wants a deposit before production. So the importer's DPO is low exactly when the DIO is highest — the worst possible combination for cash.

---

What does the cash-conversion cycle look like week by week?

Mapped across a typical 13-week first run, the cycle moves through seven stages: EU deposit, production, ocean freight, customs and duty, 3PL receiving, first sale, and net-60 wholesale collection. Cash leaves in the first four stages and does not begin returning until the sixth — the trough sits around US arrival, roughly weeks 8 to 11.

The exact weeks vary by manufacturer lead time, sailing schedule, and how fast you convert first inventory. The table below is an illustrative operator timeline for a founder's first container, not a guarantee — your dates will move. It exists to show the shape of the gap.

Read the running-position column, not the calendar. The brand is cash-negative for the entire first two months and the single deepest point is arrival — the moment founders emotionally feel "the product is finally here" is the moment the bank balance is at its worst. Duty and landed-cost line items all land in the same week; our companion guide on currency, freight & landed cost for EU→US beverage imports breaks down every one of those port-day charges.

Then the recovery is slow and lumpy. DTC trickles; wholesale is the real money but arrives on the distributor's clock, not yours.

---

Why is the net-60 wholesale receivable the most dangerous part?

Wholesale is where the volume is, but distributor and retailer terms in beverage commonly run net-30 to net-60 (Resolve) — so your biggest, most exciting purchase order is also the slowest to convert to cash. A founder who lands a large first account can go more cash-negative in the weeks after the win, not less.

This is counterintuitive and it catches people. You sign a distributor. You ship a large order. You have effectively pre-paid for that inventory months earlier in euros — and now you wait 30 to 60 days for the invoice to clear, during which you may need to fund the next production run to keep the account supplied. Growth, at this stage, consumes cash faster than it generates it.

The industry rule of thumb is stark: one analysis cited a beverage brand growing 48% year over year that required $1.38 of working capital for every $1 of revenue growth (via CPG working-capital analysis). Faster growth, bigger gap. This is why "we got into a national chain" is sometimes the sentence that precedes a cash crisis rather than a celebration.

Three defensive moves:

• Qualify the receivable. Know the distributor's actual pay behaviour, not just the stated terms. Net-60 often means net-75 in practice.
• Stagger, don't dump. Phasing a large first order into releases keeps you from funding the entire account's inventory at once. Our guide to inventory & demand planning for a new import covers how to size those releases.
• Price the float in. If you are effectively financing your distributor for two months, that cost belongs in your wholesale margin model — covered in operations & finance for a non-alcoholic brand's US launch.

---

How do you finance the gap?

The financing stack for an imported brand runs from cheapest to most expensive: supplier terms, then purchase-order and inventory finance, then asset-based lines, then revenue-based financing, then equity. Most brands use more than one, and the discipline is matching the duration of the financing to the duration of the gap — you do not want permanent equity funding a temporary cash trough, or a 12-month loan funding a 60-day receivable.

A critical clarification first: the SBA Export Working Capital Program (EWCP) is designed for US small businesses generating export sales, and disburses against foreign purchase orders or receivables (SBA). It is not a tool for an EU brand importing into the US. Founders find it in searches and waste weeks. Which US-domestic programs you can access depends on where and when you incorporate your US entity — worth raising early with a US-side advisor.

Here is the realistic menu, with 2026 cost ranges from Bridge Marketplace:

The number that matters is not the headline APR but the cost of one cycle. A 60-day draw at 20% APR costs roughly 3.3% of the sum financed. Against that, weigh what the capital buys: keeping a shelf placement, avoiding a stockout on your first national account, or not selling equity at a seed-stage valuation to cover a temporary trough. Framed as cost-per-cycle, financing the gap is often the disciplined choice, not the desperate one.

One caution on revenue-based financing: repayment scales with revenue, which sounds gentle but punishes exactly the lumpy, quarterly-shipment cash flow that imported wholesale brands have. It fits DTC-steady brands far better than a founder living off net-60 distributor cheques.

---

How do you shorten the gap instead of just funding it?

Every day you remove from the cash gap is a day you do not have to finance — and shortening levers are almost always cheaper than borrowing. The three highest-leverage moves are negotiating supplier terms, choosing freight mode deliberately, and accelerating the wholesale receivable.

Attack it in order of cost:

1. Supplier terms (free). A 30/70 deposit-on-order, balance-on-shipment split, or better yet net terms on the balance, can move three to five weeks of cash off your books at zero cost. Manufacturers with real export businesses are the most flexible; ask, and ask again once you have one clean run behind you.

2. Freight mode (cheap-to-moderate). Ocean is cheapest per case but adds 2–5 weeks of transit — weeks your cash is committed to goods at sea. For a small, high-value first run, part-air or expedited LCL can compress the gap meaningfully; the freight premium may be less than the financing cost of the extra float. Model it both ways.

3. Receivable acceleration (moderate). Offer an early-payment discount (e.g. 2% for net-10) to distributors who will take it — you are effectively buying back your own cash at a known rate. Invoice the day you ship, not the day the month closes.

4. Order sizing (free, and often overlooked). A smaller, faster first run cycles cash back sooner and de-risks the whole model, even if unit costs are higher. A container you cannot fund on time is more expensive than a half-container you can. Right-sizing the first order is the single most underrated cash lever — see inventory & demand planning for a new import.

---

In our launches

We have watched more than one European founder do everything right on the product and nearly come undone on the calendar. In the Boisson years, the brands that scaled cleanly were rarely the ones with the deepest pockets — they were the ones who treated the timing of cash as seriously as the size of it. The founders who got hurt were almost always the ones who won a big first account and mistook the purchase order for cash in the bank. The order was real. The cash was sixty days away, and the next production deposit was due in thirty.

The pattern we now insist on before any first container ships: model the trough, not the average. Know the exact week your balance is lowest, know the number, and have the bridge — whether it is supplier terms, a line, or your own reserve — arranged before you place the deposit. Cash-gap surprises are almost always failures of sequencing, and sequencing is knowable in advance.

---

Frequently asked questions

How much working capital does a first US import run actually tie up? For a founder's first container, plan on cash committed from the EU supplier deposit through first wholesale collection for roughly 90–150 days — the common cash-conversion-cycle range for emerging CPG brands per CFO Pro Analytics. On a modest first order, that is often the single largest cheque the brand writes that year, and it is out the door before a single case sells.

When in the cycle does cash actually go negative? Cash typically goes most negative at US arrival — you have paid the supplier deposit, the balance, ocean freight, duty, and 3PL receiving, but nothing has sold yet. That trough sits weeks 8–11 in a typical timeline. First DTC sales soften it; the wholesale net-60 receivable is what finally pulls you back to positive.

Can I ask my EU manufacturer for better payment terms to shrink the gap? Yes, and it is the cheapest lever available. A 30/70 deposit-on-order, balance-on-shipment split, or net terms on the balance, moves weeks of cash off your books at zero financing cost. Established manufacturers with export experience are often open to it; new relationships rarely are until you have a track record.

Is the SBA Export Working Capital Program available to my EU brand? Generally no. The SBA's EWCP finances US small businesses generating export sales, not foreign brands importing into the US, per the SBA. Your financing options are supplier terms, purchase-order and inventory finance, asset-based lines, revenue-based financing, and equity — sized to where you incorporate your US entity.

What does it cost to finance the gap instead of self-funding it? In 2026, asset-based inventory lines run roughly 8–15% APR, purchase-order financing 12–30%, and revenue-based financing 15–35% effective APR, per Bridge Marketplace. The right question is not the headline rate but the cost of one cycle — a 60-day draw at 20% APR costs roughly 3.3% of the amount financed, often cheaper than the equity dilution or lost shelf placement it prevents.

How is this different from landed cost? Landed cost tells you what one case costs to get into your warehouse. Working capital tells you when the cash leaves and comes back. Two brands can have identical landed cost and wildly different cash gaps depending on supplier terms, freight mode, and wholesale collection speed. You need both models before you commit to a US launch.